It a shame that … It a shame that Google is stressing new exciting content. I thought the internet WAS a great place to find information – not just current but also legacy. Besides, Google seems very fickle and is hard to keep up with anyways. Their search results return millions of links but none are ever quite useful.
I do have a few questions: Can sites even be indexed if they are not registered in Webmaster Tools? Will they show up in searches?
Regarding links, … Regarding links, what if you discover a site already syndicating/linking to you, and want to buy (banner) ads on rest of site since it’s relevant? That looks like link-buying but clearly is not, and how could goog ever know?
OK, there goes … OK, there goes MTurk Seriously, I used it in a similar relevant way and was warned about using it for “SEO”. That was NOT the idea. One man’s free link-bait is another’s slander suit.
I’m guessing this … I’m guessing this pertains to how to please Google’s PR system or hands on site rankers? Do bloggers trust Google’s PR anymore? Seems your content rank happens at the drop of a hat on someone’s whim. At least that’s my experience.
It’s hard sometimes … It’s hard sometimes, though, Matt, when you have a creative idea that would make for great ‘linkbait’ and nobody finds out about it, the snowball needs a shove to get it started: what do you suggest that ‘shove’ should be?
Simply put, if linkbait falls in the forest with noboday around to hear it, does it make a sound?
I’ve used up my daily analogy AND my mixed metaphor quotas in one YouTube comment: impressed?
It a shame that …
It a shame that Google is stressing new exciting content. I thought the internet WAS a great place to find information – not just current but also legacy. Besides, Google seems very fickle and is hard to keep up with anyways. Their search results return millions of links but none are ever quite useful.
I do have a few questions: Can sites even be indexed if they are not registered in Webmaster Tools? Will they show up in searches?
It was a really …
It was a really clean link bait idea – statsbait is very common in white hat circles.
OMG that was the …
OMG that was the most nerdy linkbait ever.
You forgot to …
You forgot to mention that people described Obama as ‘Spam” lmao. Selective hearing/reading??
Regarding links, …
Regarding links, what if you discover a site already syndicating/linking to you, and want to buy (banner) ads on rest of site since it’s relevant? That looks like link-buying but clearly is not, and how could goog ever know?
OK, there goes …
Seriously, I used it in a similar relevant way and was warned about using it for “SEO”. That was NOT the idea. One man’s free link-bait is another’s slander suit.
OK, there goes MTurk
I’m guessing this …
I’m guessing this pertains to how to please Google’s PR system or hands on site rankers? Do bloggers trust Google’s PR anymore? Seems your content rank happens at the drop of a hat on someone’s whim. At least that’s my experience.
It’s hard sometimes …
It’s hard sometimes, though, Matt, when you have a creative idea that would make for great ‘linkbait’ and nobody finds out about it, the snowball needs a shove to get it started: what do you suggest that ‘shove’ should be?
Simply put, if linkbait falls in the forest with noboday around to hear it, does it make a sound?
I’ve used up my daily analogy AND my mixed metaphor quotas in one YouTube comment: impressed?
lol Al Gore is the …
lol Al Gore is the furthest top right
Very nice
Thanks …
Thanks for the insight.
Very nice
guess i’ll have to …
guess i’ll have to go black hat, this video isn’t working.
LOL
broken?
broken?